>>52 here...
>>58
the argv[0]
was used because i thought maybe HAHAHaruhi would change it to argv[1]
, which would be a bug.
but there are other bugs as well:
first...
$ gcc -lm -o hahafail hahafail.c
/var/tmp//ccBv2HKb.o(.text+0x41): In function `main':
: undefined reference to `sqrtl'
second... an intmax_t
value is not guaranteed to fit in a long double
.