ADA (13)

1 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-04-13 01:09 ID:j2x8qNwp

Anyone programmed in ADA? If so what's your experiences.

2 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-04-13 11:36 ID:c+Ak9/ug

I have not programmed in ADA therefore I don't have any experiences to share with you.

3 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-09 19:59 ID:3YDqkyhu

Didn't like it. Mostly because of the syntax. I felt constricted compared to C.

4 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-10 01:37 ID:R2LvJ8Tv

there was nothing particularly good or bad about it, its useable but i would never use it for anything since i can never see a reason.

5 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-25 00:30 ID:l6Iv8T7t

The only experience I have with Ada is from the examples at rosettacode.org. The feelings I have are that Ada is an over-the-toply complex, verbose and boring language.

Oh well. Someone prove me wrong. Maybe Ada can serve some purpose?

6 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-25 02:37 ID:fnz5bop0

>>5
That IS its purpose.

7 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-25 04:25 ID:D6plFpSS

>>6
So why would anyone use it instead of Java, which is a more popular over-the-toply complex, verbose and boring language?

8 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E : 2009-05-25 06:41 ID:Heaven

There are some interesting uses, like SPARKAda.

If you're writing software that lives will depend on, it should be criminal to not use something like it. Apparently a lot of medical equipment doesn't, which creeps me out.

9 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-05-28 02:50 ID:Heaven

>>8
what really creeps me out is seeing a windows BSOD on medical equipment.

10 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-06-05 12:49 ID:3YDqkyhu

>>7
Maybe because of the standardized compilers

11 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-06-10 16:00 ID:Z29U4G1D

Code a missile's CPU.

That's about it.

12 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2009-06-10 21:23 ID:Heaven

>>11
I don't think there's any ada compilers for playstation 2.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.