A Problem in Logic (42)

10 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-05-04 15:53 ID:MuJs/AX1

>>8
also, let me tell you right now that if you're referring to >>6
thinking that the absolute gibberish 

tD(a,b,c) == tD(a,b,c) == TRUE

(which ill assume you meant what was posted in >>3) 

tD(a,b,c) == tD(a,b,d) == False //you're correction

is anywhere close to being right
you are the fucking retard my dear friend.

fE(1, 2, 1, 2)
tD( 1, 2, 1) == tD(1, 2, 2) == false
false == false == false
true

not gonna cut it faggot

or the other way 

fE(1, 1, 1, 1)
tD(1, 1, 1) == tD(1, 1, 1) == true
false == false == true
false

not gonna cut it nigger

14 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-05-04 17:56 ID:MuJs/AX1

>>13
well, let's see...

frE( 1, 2, 1, 1 ) =>
not( thrD( 1, 2, 1) or thrD( 2, 1, 1) ) =>
not( FALSE or FALSE ) =>
not( FALSE ) =>
TRUE

close, but no cigar. and this is assuming thrD() actually does what it's suppose to, namely determine if all three arguments are different. your code for thrD() does not do this.

thrD( 1, 2, 1 ) =>
not( 1 == 2 == 1 )
not( FALSE )
TRUE
Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.