>>35
So, 99% of the 1% is crap, and 99% of "the 99%" is crap too?
>>42
It's 99% of the greater whole, unless you keep applying the 99% law to itself (zOMG TIME PARADOX)
So in other words, 99% of 99% crap craps are 99% crap, including 99% of the 99% of the 1% non-crap that is both crap and not crap?
This means crapness asymptotically approaches 1 for anyything non-atomic!
I'll go and alert the president.