[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Personal][#20]

[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Personal][#20] (999)

1 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8189 22:03 [No]

550 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8251 22:49 [No]

>>543
Why would you even have doubts about it. If you can buy burritos at 3 in the morning in your city, you can hire a male prostitute.

551 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 01:01 [No]

>>548
No. Am lesbian. Non practicing lesbian. It seems now I am old enough that everyone else has experience and nobody wants to be my first time. I live in a small college town and there ain't too many grills here; I teach right now so I'm not trying to have sex with an undergrad. I also may have legit aspergers.

I don't think sex tourism is for me anyways. It's was an interesting flight of fancy but I don't think I'd enjoy it if I had sex that way.

sorry for making you all read mi diario amigos just wanted to clear that up i agree with you men are gross

552 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 01:31 [No]

>>551
I'm sure this is all obvious advice, but I suggest visiting or moving to a place with a high density of lesbians. For example, I live in the Bay Area and its reputation for being a homosexual haven is actually quite true. Over half of my female friends are lesbian and they all say it's easy to get laid here. You can do it through apps like Tinder, by visiting one of many lesbian bars, or even just in your daily life if you're confident enough to flirt with people. Of course it's still probably going to be a little difficult if you're unattractive or socially awkward, but to tell the truth I've met plenty of nerdy, awkward, unattractive women who are still happily getting laid here. (And I'm sure you're much hotter than them, fellow DQNer!)

Then again, if it's just sex you're after, vibrators+porn is probably better, honsetly. I think the main advantage to real-life sex is that feelings of affection for your partner make it feel better. In any case, I wish you luck.

553 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 02:57 [No]

If I were a girl I'd be so fuckin' gay.

554 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 04:04 [No]

You could really call anybody "The Scaleless".

555 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 04:15 [No]

I haven't seen modern dubs, but watching some of the older ones, all of the characters become much more direct and kind of bitchy in the dubbed version.

556 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 05:22 [No]

Sex tourism is the only option for sexual sadist lesbians.

557 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 07:59 [No]

Men who cut their dicks off to find intimacy as "lesbian" are weird. WEIRD!

558 Name: >>540 : 1993-09-8252 10:01 [No]

>>551
Wow... Women are pretty gross too, you know!

559 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 14:17 [No]

>>558 I'm a man who's not even gay, yet I agree with this.

560 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 14:24 [No]

>>551
People here might think differently, but your first time shouldn't be with a hired escort. I mean, once you get money, it won't be hard to find a hooker who's willing to do lesbian but... I don't recommend having your first time to be with a prostitute. It's terrible. Awful. Don't do it. I would've much preferred to swallow 20 minutes of awkwardness and rejection than doing that shit.
Try tinder or something.

561 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 15:05 [No]

>>557 I would agree if I thought there was a single man in the world who's ever done this, because it sounds fucking insane.

Then again, some people are insane, so it's probably happened at least a few times.

562 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 15:29 [No]

>>561
CWC comes close, but >she hasn't had any sort of surgery.

563 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 15:47 [No]

>>561
There are plenty of people who married and then did sex reassignment but still liked their partner.

564 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8252 16:30 [No]

>>561
Didn't one of the Matrix guys do this

565 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 16:52 [No]

Don't be put off just because your first time goes bad. I kept talking about how the champagne-flavoured condoms were really stinky, and I was sweating like crazy. Look at me now though, I'm a sex god!

566 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 17:55 [No]

>>564
Since recent times, both, actually. They are sisters now.

567 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8252 22:50 [No]

The Wachowskis changed their avatars' gender inside the matrix lol

568 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 02:32 [No]

Yeah, kidney stone, park half way down my dicktube. THANKS A LOT you itchy little fuck.

569 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 04:23 [No]

https://medium.com/@ConsenSys/an-introduction-to-ipfs-9bba4860abd0#.aihzh2po7
(˘･ᴗ･˘)

570 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 05:30 [No]

>>569
This is exciting stuff. Thank you for sharing, DQN.

571 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 07:58 [No]

Be a bisexual bee

572 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 10:57 [No]

>>569
That is actually really cool.

573 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 18:28 [No]

>>569
Awesome, will try to contribute in whatever way possible.

574 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8253 22:48 [No]

This is how it is done.

575 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8254 15:15 [No]

An AI beat a 9 Dan professional Go player for the best time last month. Cool.

576 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8254 22:30 [No]

Well, now I understand why everyone wants to become a monk/nun.

577 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8254 23:53 [No]

What do you do when you're feeling blue?

578 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 00:10 [No]

>>576 I definitely think about that myself sometimes. Seems like a way less stressful life. But there are probably stressful things about being a monk or a nun too that we don't know about.

579 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 00:36 [No]

If you kill the tranny in the new Baldur's Gate thing, does she drop a pair of fake melons?

580 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 03:06 [No]

>>570 >>572 >>573
Thanks. I'm still waiting for it to be able to run inside of I2P. It is very cool without I2P, however.

581 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 03:34 [No]

So, if I do it, it might actually work. It does make sense.
But why did it not work before with them?

582 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 14:59 [No]

Hell yeah, I got a 20% student discount on my new dildo.

583 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 15:57 [No]

genuinely reflecting

584 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 18:47 [No]

>>580
I've got a couple of projects in mind for IPFS, one being a standard DNS TXT static website.

The other is a distributed BBS sort of resembling a blockchain. Once I start actually working on it, and if my understanding of IPFS is correct, it should be able to mitigate (some) anonymity issues of running over plain IP.

585 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 22:24 [No]

>>584
Yeah, a bbs would be awesome, but I don't understand how you'd get the most recent commit. I still don't really know how it all works, but what it looks like to me is that the hash of the commit you have can only point to previous commits of itself and can't be altered. If you were to make a bbs with this, how would you get the most recent comments?

586 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8255 23:25 [No]

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1JQXsm6jP91

587 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 00:01 [No]

>>586
That was pretty good.

588 Name: （ ´_ゝ`） : 1993-09-8256 00:27 [No]

Have they actually tested handling of hash collisions?

589 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 01:27 [No]

>>588
I was wondering that too, so I looked into it. Unless the algorithm that designates that hash is just prone to collision, then the 32 byte hash should make it statistically unlikely that a collision would occur. There are 2^256 = 1.16e77 possible hashes. Say that hashes were generated every millisecond, then you would use all the hashes at 1.16e77ms*(1s/1000ms)*(1min/60s)*(1hr/60min)*(1day/24hours)*(1year/365days)*(1(age of the universe)/(13.8e9years)) = 2.67e56(age of the universe). But if there are reasons to be concerned about hash collision other than the size of the hash, I'm not aware of them.

590 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 01:46 [No]

>>589
Also, there should be someway to calculate the probability of a collision happening within in one age of the universe using the birthday paradox, but I'm not smart enough to do that.

591 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 02:33 [No]

>>552,560
Thanks for the advice amigos. I'll be ok.

I should try tinder. But I'm too shy to do it and I don't have a Facebook account anyway and I'm not really willing to make one. Doesn't seem like you can get away with a fake one easily.

592 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 05:13 [No]

If I could just get rid of the man boobs, I'd be set.

593 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 07:54 [No]

>>591 You could try care homes or orphanages or something like that maybe? They always reek of desperation whenever I walk past

594 Name: （ ´_ゝ`） : 1993-09-8256 10:03 [No]

>>589
>>590
That's not very reassuring. We used to think md5sum was good. Now we don't, and we've known how to create collisions for it for a decade (http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/). SHA-1 is a 160-bit hash that we used to think was good. We now have (kinda) collision generation for it (https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/967 - read the Recommendations at https://sites.google.com/site/itstheshappening/ for a good overview of where on the ‘not good’ scale it falls).

To invoke the birthday paradox as you requested, the average time before A Bad Thing is given by the time to generate 2^(256/2) hashes for a 256-bit sum. Using your calculations, it's ~1e17 * AOU. Note that the same calculations for SHA-1 yield ~3e4 * AOU, and SHA-1 is considered unsafe. Even the humble md5sum yields ~0.04 * AOU, and I can generate a collision in seven minutes on a five year old personal computer (http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/).

Who is to say that their hash function will never be ‘not good’? Is there a way of sanely upgrading the infrastructure to use a different hash function later?

Alternately, there could be a very good reason why the hash can't be exploited. Git's design makes hash collisions only detrimental to the collider (you can't use a SHA-1 collision to send a poison commit that screws up a remote repository, it just results in your commit getting dropped (I think)). I don't immediately see that similar logic applies to this project, but if it does, it would be the best-case scenario.

595 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 15:03 [No]

596 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 16:21 [No]

>>576,578
I used to think this when I was a kid but then I lost my religion and now doing math / memorising stuff fills the gap somewhat. Historically they are related activities I guess.

>>593
lol

597 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 17:02 [No]

Is it worse to be objectified or subjugated?

598 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 19:02 [No]

>>594
Thanks for the resources! As for a sane way to upgrade from SHA256, the first two bytes specify what hash they are using: "the first two bytes in hex is 1220, where 12 denotes that this is the SHA256 hash function and 20 is the length of the hash in bytes ― 32 bytes." I'm guessing they included that so that the hash could be changed at some point. That's just my guess though.

599 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 21:25 [No]

Scarlet is actually a really nice girls' name.

600 Name: （ ´_ゝ`） : 1993-09-8256 22:11 [No]

>>598
Thanks for clarifying - that sounds like a pretty sane upgrade path to me. I still see confusing points (like that other guy said: how would a BBS work?), but my thinking is now “Cool, how would this work?” rather than “Would this even work at all?”.

601 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 22:20 [No]

I swear I'm not actually this pretentious, it's all just a big misunderstanding.

602 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8256 23:27 [No]

I am Andrew.

603 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8257 04:17 [No]

Have I carved enough?

604 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 09:33 [No]

I want to love you like a zombie.

605 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 10:50 [No]

>>585
Nodes broadcast "I'm interested in this board" and others interested in the same board scan around to find it (if I understand the DHT mechanisms correctly).
When you post, your node's IPNS reference updates; others pick it up, merge the difference into their copy of the board, and broadcast the new board; this repeats ad infinitum until every node sees the same board. It'll be one giant self-updating graph of replies pointing to posts pointing to threads.
There would be no way to trust who posted when, so every post must be a reply to another, and ordering of sibling replies would remain unspecified. Also, spam mitigation would probably have to involve blacklisting nodes.
You could run a node yourself or visit a website running the same software, and it wouldn't matter.

>>588-590,594
I don't think birthday collisions are an interesting problem on this scale or for this system, because you'd need a universe's worth of data for one to occur. Targeted attacks are more of an issue, but not in the near future. SHA-1 is unsafe, but the current cost to generate a collision is around $70,000, and the hash can be changed when SHA-256 suffers the same fate, as >>598 says. (Git, meanwhile, isn't interested in any of this because it is not designed for security. Trusting a commit is for the repo owner to worry about.)

606 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 16:54 [No]

I haven't been on DQN in close to 5 years, but I feel like I'm right at home.

I don't want a job, but I also am getting tired of sitting in my mom's apartment everyday. I'm a loser, but a nice one.

607 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 18:35 [No]

(´-௰- )zZZzZ ʕ•|
(´-௰- ) ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ|
(´•௰• ) ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ|
Go away Bears!
⁽⁽◝(´•௰• )◜⁾⁾ʕ•ᴥ•ʔʕ|

608 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8257 18:37 [No]

>>606
Where have you been?

609 Name: (´д｀；) : 1993-09-8257 19:48 [No]

>>608
I somehow managed to graduate high school and immediately moved out with a person I was engaged with. Long story short, I wasn't ready to live on my own and now I'm back at NEET status and scrambling to collect pieces of my life together. I'm selling 90% of what I own to save money so that I can afford taxis to a job (I never got my driver's license). I wasted a lot of time and I'm kind of paying the price for it.

I don't necessarily think it'll all be too hard , I'm still only 21 so I have my whole life ahead of me. I've got no support system though, but I can't expect my parents to help me out more than giving me a place to sleep, especially with that I have been putting them through.

610 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 21:01 [No]

>>605
From what I can tell, a node can only broadcast that they are interested in a particular version of the board. You can request a hash, but a hash is associated with only one version of one file (given there are no collisions) in the network. Any modification of that file would no longer have the same hash. The file would have no way of predicting what the next hash would be, since the hash is determined by the content, which supposedly it wouldn't know at least in the case of a BBS. I'm still learning about this, so I could be completely wrong.

611 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8257 22:40 [No]

Why won't the bears just leave him alone?

612 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8257 22:49 [No]

Also there needs to be a kind of Seven Up! series for long forgotten internet sensations. Some group that checks up on the once popular icons every seven or so years. The people need to know where Charlie Bit My Finger kid will be in a few years and what Star Wars kid has done with his life.

613 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8257 23:33 [No]

I temporarily freed myself from the albatross but it'll be back again tomorrow.

614 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 04:22 [No]

Who here poops from their butt? Don't be ashamed, raise your hands.

615 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 06:36 [No]

I'm hesitant to admit it.

616 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 06:48 [No]

>>610
Look duderino the problem you're pointing out would apply to the most recent version of any website, e.g. news

There has to be a standard way of dealing with this somewhere

617 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 09:21 [No]

RETSU TOOKU WIZU INGURISHU HAGU MII HORU MII GIBU MII KISU

618 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 09:40 [No]

>>610
You're not wrong, but you don't have the full story. There's no need for the board to be the only data your node has.
https://github.com/ipfs/notes/issues/15
Concretely, every node interested in the same board (on the same BBS protocol and version) would run something like echo 'dqn@ipfsbbs.0' | ipfs block put, and then ipfs dht findprovs <blockname for dqn@ipfsbbs.0> to find other nodes who have done the same.
I haven't actually tried that yet though, so I could still be mistaken in what exactly is supposed to happen.

619 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 14:00 [No]

>>618
But what's keeping me from uploading pictures of genital mutilation and calling it dqn@ipfsbbs.0?

620 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 15:56 [No]

>>619
If your node only contains genital mutilation and doesn't even resemble a board, all nodes ignore you.
If you're trying to shitpost to an existing board and I don't like it, I blacklist you from my node manually. My node will pretend your posts don't exist in the board, but may still have to consider them for legit replies. (This might be where it has to abandon simple ipfs filenames and do a deep graph inspection/diff for every node.)
If your node tries to pretend existing posts have different data on an existing board, you have broken SHA-256, so well done. All other nodes will ignore you though because they already have the data for those posts and won't try to redownload it.

621 Name: (´д｀；) : 1993-09-8258 16:16 [No]

>>617
WAO~ ZATSU SAUNDO RAIKU A GU AIJIA ! INGURISHU TOOKINGU YARERU NO KANA ? OH NO ! INGURISHU ?

622 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 16:32 [No]

>>621
It's from a song!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4WCrd6ZGHg
ZISU IZU A PEN

623 Name: (´д｀；) : 1993-09-8258 16:35 [No]

>>622
guriin tii
caoffuiii

624 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 18:50 [No]

>>616
Yes, a BBS was just an example. No, there doesn't have to be a standard way of dealing with this.

>>618
Ok, I'm not sure I fully understand, but it looks like it can be done. That makes IPFS sound more promising to me. I need to keep learning about it, and see what I can do.

625 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8258 18:57 [No]

I have no idea what you guys are talking about, but it seems exciting.

626 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8258 20:01 [No]

>>624
I'll make this the next project I start. Talking about it here has helped me figure some bits out.
My main reservations are the fact that there's only one and a half implementations (Go and partially JS) and other interfaces are just dumb wrappers, and the fact that you can only pin one file (but that's changing soon enough).

627 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8259 17:50 [No]

Why? Because we still have a case system, God dammit!

628 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8259 20:58 [No]

629 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8260 00:41 [No]

Holy shit! It actually nearly killed me!

630 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8260 04:28 [No]

A movie in which the twist is that the twist is something so obvious that you think the author was implying it from the beginning.

character 1:"Why am I the only one who can see you?"
character 2:"I guess because others aren't looking. Think of me as an imaginary friend. God, I miss you're mother. If only I could've seen you grow up."
character 1:"Why do you say that?"
character 2:"No reason. Come on, if you need to do that homework, let me give you a hand."
an hour later into the movie
character 1:"Why can't you just go away! WHAT ARE YOU?!"
character 2:"I'm... I'm you're father."
character 1:"B-but my father passed away... when I was a baby..."
flash to all the scenes in the movie, so that the audience can make the connection
audience: "Oh shit, I wasn't supposed to know that."

631 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8260 09:31 [No]

https://podricing.pw/uploads/images/scaled_full_a08435ddca0598f29101.jpg

632 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8260 09:31 [No]

The Internet!

633 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8260 15:26 [No]

I should've gone for the socks.

634 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 01:19 [No]

I thought "I'm just going to leave these apple slices here while I go do something." Then I replied "just promise me you'll still love these apple slices when they old and brown."

635 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 01:28 [No]

Man I love Japanese porn titles...

"
[AP116] My Daughter’s Chest That’s Recently Grown So Large is Right in Front of My Eyes! We Took a Family Vacation For the First Time in Many Years and Finding Myself Sleeping Next to My Daughter Since Who Knows When is Causing Me Such Strain That I Can’t Sleep! The Reason For This is That Lately Her Chest Has Gotten Big and As I Love Big Tits, I Get Horny and I Just Can’t Help It! My Daughter’s Sleeping Restlessly and Little By Little, Her Cotton Kimono Comes Undone and Her Prominently Exposed Rack is Mere Centimeter From My Eyes and the Tip of My Nose! I’m Her Father, But This is Testing the Limits of My Self-Control!! Unable to Contain Myself, I Discreetly Touched Her Chest Softly!! “No, Don’t Even Think About What’ll Happen If You Get Caught”! (That’s My Heart Talking) Yielding to Momentary Pleasure, I Felt Her Up!! As Expected, She Woke Up to See My Dreadful Face At Close Distance and Unable to Say Anything, She Was At My Complete Mercy! Naturally, In the End, I Came Inside of Her!!
"

636 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 01:35 [No]

>>635
I'm still really curious who translates these titles, it seems like Engrish but the grammar is always perfect...

637 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 03:19 [No]

I was worried they were going to be mean to him, so I made a helpful comment in preparation for what could have been a wave of negative comments. It turns out I was the most negative comment.

638 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 04:09 [No]

auauaughghghghgh
i need to sleep

>>637 I thought they would be mean to him too senpai

639 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 04:49 [No]

Mr. DQN, do you how do?

640 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8261 06:01 [No]

Who's up for making a DQN-zine?

641 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 07:53 [No]

>>640 hey yeah sure! I drew a DQN picture but didn't really have a reason to show anyone

642 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 09:41 [No]

>>640
I'd be down with that.

643 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 17:19 [No]

My butt is not cute.

644 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 18:11 [No]

I want blues scale wind chimes, so the wind has a chance of playing some Howlin' Wolf now and then.

645 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 21:37 [No]

I wish I knew more people I could play Mahjong with

646 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-8261 21:40 [No]

>>645
Come over

647 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 22:55 [No]

>>640
DQNzine sounds really cool. Like, totes underground and hip!

648 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 23:01 [No]

Dope Quality Newspapers

649 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-8261 23:50 [No]

I feel like a fool now. Somebody stop me!

	Return Entire thread Previous 100 posts Next 100 posts Last 50 posts
	This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.