IE is a crappy web browser.
I don't hate I multiply
I'd rather watch the next Michael Bay Transformers film than the new Ghostbusters film.
>>579
I'd definitely rather watch the new Ghostbusters film three times in a row than any Bayformers film not even exaggerating.
Donald Drumpf, lmfao.
The radical left wing only help the right-wing.
Shut - ins, Asian drivers, jay walkers.
Hate, self-referencing, love
Almond-based gelato is terrible terrible terrible shit don't eat it.
Almond-based shit is terrible terrible terrible gelato don't eat it.
>>588
I was going to correct you but then I remembered that that really is the title of the movie. What a dumb title.
The Baldur's Gate remake sucks.
The cartoons in the New Yorker aren't funny.
Antifascism is about as productive as antismallpoxism.
Those shreaking tweenage girls on the bus didn't know "abtrusive" isn't a word.
Weaboos don't know shit about Japan.
The entire Bible is not literally true.
zika babies lack brains
>>597
They had thick Nottingham accents so the 'a' was distinctly such. Plus the girl that actually said it raised her voice a bit to do so, and put emphasis on the word ("that's a bit abtrusive, isn't it?") so there's no doubt she was trying to sound like she understood this non-existent word.
I don't remember the context but my best guess would be somewhere between "obtuse" and "abusive", perhaps attempting to convey the meaning behind the former after hearing it this one time, but only remembering it as a word similar in form to the latter.
If you smoke recreational weed outside Colorado or Washington, why do you think making guns illegal will make them go away?
>>599
It's not an all-or-nothing situation. Compare the number of pot smokers in Colorado and Washington to the general population.
>>600 I'm drawing a comparison because recreational marijuana smoking is illegal outside those states, yet people do it. How can someone constantly do something illegal and think that by making something illegal that it goes away?
>>601
I don't think stricter regulations would make guns go away, I think they would lead to fewer people owning guns and killing themselves or others due to impulse or accident. Admittedly gun control wouldn't have done anything to stop the Orlando shooting and I'm kind of embarrassed by people who argue that it would.
>>601 Who are these people that think making something illegal makes it go away? Are there really people who truly think that?
I think there should be more controls on who can own guns and less controls on which guns can be owned. So, if you can pass a background check and a basic mental health exam and aren't a terror suspect or something you ought to be able to own whatever guns you want.
A gun is a tool, and its sole purpose is to kill. Bad people who want guns will always be able to get guns whether they're legal or not. Then less-bad people want a gun to defend themselves, but by defending yourself like that you get blood on your hands, so you also end up in the fiery pit. To improve as a species we should be moving past these base, primal killing instincts. If someone breaks into your home and is about to shoot you, take it like a man instead of shooting him like a little bitch.
I think since democrats are more likely to kill innocent people with guns, where republicans are more likely to use them for sport hunting and self defense, only republicans should be allowed to own guns.
Crystal Pepsi tasted awful and now they are trying to bring it back:
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NY-Crystal-Pepsi-Returns-1990s-Nostalgia-Clear-Soda-Pop-384997211.html
The "starvation mode" theory is dumb. If fat is there to serve as backup energy when times are hard, why would the body store more fat during hard times.
Hosting the Olympics is almost always going to result in financial disaster for a city.
Existing was always going to result in disaster for Rio.
Also, honestly, is golf really an Olympic sport? What next, is Tokyo going to host darts and pool tournaments in 4 years' time?
Vegans who try to make their cats live on an all-plant diet are making an animal who doesn't know any better suffer for their selfish human feelings which is exactly what vegans claim to be against.
Vegans who proclaim eating meat as cruel should consider how all the poor vegetables feel about being grown and eaten en masse by vegans. What a bunch of plant-murdering assholes!
So how about those lawyers?
Let's talk about women.
I don't like spammers and I am definitely not going to visit their websites.
Women: can't live with 'em
People who complain on the Internet about the censoring methods on Japanese porn don't understand Japanese porn. They could repeal the law today and in 10 years at least half the ero industry will still be doing it.
"Firing Line with William Buckley" has a lot less gunplay than it sounds like.
Gaijin say they don't get tsukkomi humor but they get jokes about Clippy.
People who have a thinkpiece criticizing a style guide neglect to mention the crucial part of it that gives you tacit permission to break its rules if the result is an absolute pile of shit.
People who post in the "ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought" thread.
That TV show was not very good.