>>12
Okay, I was ready to throw you a line after >>11's insightful inquisition into your vaguely redeeming qualities as compared to >>10's awful post. You continue however to somehow sidestep the established theme of the entire thread (save only your use of the original textual format, which even then is marred by unacceptably individualist additions), thus contributing little if anything at all towards its intended idiosyncrasies. Therefore I am almost willing to renounce any pity or praise I may have silently given you in favor of >>10's judgment, as it appears once again valid and relevant.

What this all really means, though, is that you, >>12, should just stick with today's special.