INSTANT REVIEW: C
You can complain all you want, it's not going anywhere anytime soon.
INSTANT REVIEW: ObjectPAL
VBA with weirder syntax, basic regexp support, and more fatal crashes.
INSTANT REVIEW: C++
C--
INSTANT REVIEW: bash
you need me nomatter what the review!
INSTANT REVIEW: Objective-C
Smalltalk and C are great! Let's program in both of them at the same time!
Perl:
perl -e 'print map {(split(//))[0]} (q study abs, q chomp getc, q die bind, q lstat eval, q g u fag, q die bind, q lstat eval, q y u r gay, q wantarray qw, q y 4chan is gay, q crypt ungetc, q next warn, q eval time, q die bind, q keys break, q qw uniq)'
INSTANT REVIEW: Ada
Lets blow up the world!
INSTANT REVIEW: Java
NullPointerException
INSTANT REVIEW: >>81
GA
INSTANT REVIEW: Assembly Language
Kill yourself in 1001 easy steps.
INSTANT REVIEW: MATLAB
Vector math and DSP FTW!
INSTANT REVIEW: Applescript
Tell every reader of the post "Applescript" of the thread "Instant Reviews" of the board "Programming" of the site "4-ch" of the Internet : Making programming easy for morons makes it hard for programmers. End tell.
INSTANT REVIEW: Ruby
The bastard child of Smalltalk and Perl.
INSTANT REVIEW: VHDL
For something that depends on bit
and bit_vector
so much, it sure hates literal bit strings.
INSTANT REVIEW: Python
def __Too__ Many(self, Ugly):
"""Symbols"""
INSTANT REVIEW: Brainfuck
>+++++++++[<++++++++>-]<.>+++++++[<++++>-]<+.+++++++..+++.[-]>++++++++[<++++>-]
<.#>+++++++++++[<+++++>-]<.>++++++++[<+++>-]<.+++.------.--------.[-]>++++++++[
<++++>-]<+.[-]++++++++++.
ITT we write in English as she is spoke.
INSTANT REVIEW: VB.NET
If YouAre.FuckingMoron = True Then
Kick.Self("InAss")
ElseIf
Invest.Stocks("Google")
EndIf
These are supposed to be instant reviews, not instant lame code samples.
btw, >>ElseIf
gg.
>>93
Those are reviews. Don't hate just because you can't be as witty as other people.
No, >>93 got it. This is not the "oh-so-clever pseudocode describes what the language" thread, this is the INSTANT REVIEW thread. Reviews are written in English. There's really not much that is witty about writing pseudocode. See >>65, and also see >>1-10,14,16,19-22,28-29,31,34-37,45-46,57,67 and so on.
Fucking prudes.
Why do people who don't get the jist of threads like this have to go and shit on them :(
INSTANT REVIEW: >>95
idiot
INSTANT REVIEW: C#
Modern hindi
I can't decide if >>101 is some totally hilarious joke I don't get, or just plain nonsense. Most mysterious!
>>103
That was kind of my idea, but it seems that I somewhat failed :(
INSTANT REVIEW : SCHEME
i'm glad KATE has 7 different colours for parentheses, the code looks just like rainbow afterwards
>>105
never seen scheme source or used kate, but I lol'd anyway
INSTANT REVIEW: Perl
At least it's not C shells.
Instant Review: tcl
A great way to protect your IRC chan from takeover
INSTANT REVIEW: mIRC script
Perhaps the only "language" designed specifically to code trojans and virii.
INSTANT REVIEW: Haskell
Singly-linked lists are the best data type EVER!
>>110
In all fairness, you could describe Lisp the same way.
INSTANT REVIEW: Lisp
Just like that other language.
INSTANT REVIEW: INSTANT REVIEW
Stack Overflow
INSTANT REVIEW: C
C = (BCPL--)++
INSTANT REVIEW Visual BASIC; Star BASIC
Object oriented PASCAL with added DIM statements and SUBs for that kitsch Olde Worlde feeling
Instant review: Python
clean and nice
Instant review: Ruby
Kawaii desu ne
Instant review: Java
Enterprise-grade, industry-standard, scalable language to meet business needs, maximize profits and convert visitors into customers
Instant review: Perl
The goggles, they do nothing!
>>117
Oh, boardmarkup messed with my Python review. clean and nice were between two underscores on each side each.
>>119
Who the hell is Wakabamark? (I know, I know... lurk more... but you can't expect me to know the names of everyone here.)
Instant review: Perl
Write only.
Instant review: Python
Easy to write concepts.
"Easy to write concepts"? What the hell does that even MEAN?
That it's good for prototyping but little else?
A different view of Java, based on the rather disturbing fine print in the licensing agreements:
Don't use this code for realtime control, for weapons systems, or for
anything else that may put life or limb at hazard. It isn't man-rated,
it isn't really thing-rated, and we don't claim that it's worth a good
G*dDamn for anything at all, at all.
-- Mike Andrews, on Java
INSTANT REVIEW: PHP
for(;;)if(pcntl_fork())posix_kill(posix_getpid(),11);
Instant review: AutoIt
Brave little toaster
INSTANT REVIEW: Objective-C
Oh Yeah, now we're talking! =)
INSTANT REVIEW: Objective-C 2.0
Bring on the goodness! =D
wanna try and make a os?
because if ya want to e mail me to computervirusdocter@yahoo.co.jp
ok
come
onn
INSTANT REVIEW: FORTRAN
Great if you want to make a super computer.
INSTANT REVIEW: FORTRAN/COBOL
1960 just called, it wants its code back.
INSTANT REVIEW: C
'We stopped when we got a clean compile on the following syntax:
for(;P("\n"),R--;P("|"))for(e=C;e--;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("|"+(*u/4)%2);'
>>137 ("_"+(*u++/8)%2)
Is dat some addition of strings??
>>138
It will return either '_' or '`' as a char, or as a char cast to whatever the prototype of P accepts.
The value from '(*u++/8)%2' is either a 0 or 1, cos it is the remainder of dividing '*u++/8' by 2.
This is then added to the char value of '_'.
As to what the point of it is, I have not a clue! I would like to know what P does, if it is meant to do anything at all...
Hope this helps! (and is correct...)
INSTANT REVIEW: Perl
Now, which of the 300 hundred ways of parsing a string should I use...
>>139
"" is a string, not character, literal. That expression adds 0 or 1 to the address of the string, producing (the address of) either "" or "".
Damn it. Preview post and I both fail.
INSTANT REVIEW: D
This is what happens if you use C++ too long.
>>139
>>140
Actually, I don't have a freakin clue what this does. I ripped it from the GNU humour pages: http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix-hoax.html
INSTANT REVIEW: 8052 ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE
200 lines of code, just for displaying "Hello World" on a LCD.
Google uses python.
Google, however, does not use >>144.
>>143
Nice :)
INSTANT REVIEW: HTML
Newbie: Yeah, I can only program in HTML...
Me: 0_o' ... go home.
wow >>146 you must have a big e-penis to be able to call other people newbies
INSTANT REVIEW: Genetic code (DNA)
Not a real programming language, so obviously it's ultimately useless and for noobs only.
>>148 hah
>>148
INSTANT REVIEW: Genetic code (DNA)
God: Sup guys?
Darwin: 0_o' ... go home.
Oh yes, that is indeed a mortal sin, worthy of eternal contempt and mockery.
Christ, man, get over yourself.
>>151
so people who are new to coding don't know what they're talking about? phwoar, who woulda thunk! thank you for your instant review; it was an educational experience.
next time more funny though, please.
INSTANT REVIEW: INSTANT REVIEWS of programming languages thread @ 4-ch
ITT we post INSTANT REVIEWS (with more funnay)
INSTANT REVIEW: WakabaMark
__*Bold and italic*__
**_Bold and italic_**
___God dammit___
** * EAT FLAMING DEATH! * **
>>154
There, the funniest thing I could think of. And by the way, how DO you make something bold and italic in WakabaMark? Because, I really don't know... ^_^;;
>>155
<b><i>like this?</b></i>
actually, you don't. you don't make text <b>bold</b> or <i>italicized</i> with wakabamark, you make it <em>emphasized</em> or <strong>strongly emphasized</strong>. combining emphasis and strong emphasis doesn't really make sense. if you want to make things bold and italicized, use html instead of wakabamark.
Instant Review: .NET
cross-platform shmosh-platform
INSTANT REVIEW: C
Remember back when they said C was a cross-platform language?
INSTANT REVIEW: Java
Remember back when they said Java was a cross-platform language?
C is a cross-platform language, dammit, unless your definition of "cross-platform language" is "a language in which it is not even possible to do something platform-specific", and that would be silly. I've written dozens of cross-platform C programs. You only have to try.
INSTANT REVIEW: HARBL
i'm in ur message boardz strokin it
INSTANT REVIEW: >>161
2004 called, they want their meme back.
INSTANT REVIEW: C CODE
#INCLUDE yourhotsister.fap
INSTANT REVIEW: FAIL
>>163
INSTANT REVIEW: Regular Expressions
Just because you can do stuff like ((((\p{L}\p{N})*((\.\p{L}\p{N})*)?):)?(\p{L}\p{N}((\.\p{L}\p{N})*)?))
doesn't mean you should.
INSTANT REVIEW: Haskell
We're still trying to figure out how to make it useful, but it'll be really expressive and powerful once we do.
INSTANT REVIEW: Common Lisp
The *nix of languages: full of cruft, inertia, and too many implementations.
INSTANT REVIEW: JavaScript 2.0
Perl 6.
Try and guess how many posts I have made in this thread.
i think i've posted as !WAHa.06x36 at least once in this thread... i thought everyone knew his tripcode...
a review from someone who's in the middle of learning...
Instant Review: ASM
huh...?