( ˃ Д˂) NO YOU READ YOUR FUCKING ASCII
( ˃ Д˂) ANSI INCITS 4-1986 (R2007) CLEARLY MARKS THE 6/0 ENCODING WITH A DAGGER, STATING THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE USED IN INTERNATIONAL INTERCHANGE WITHOUT DETERMINING THAT THERE IS AGREEMENT BETWEEN SENDER AND RECIPIENT
( ˃ Д˂) THIS IS BECAUSE THAT PORTION OF THE ASCII STANDARD IS UNILATERALLY DIFFERENT FROM ISO 646 AND ISO 8859 WHICH COUNTRIES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES USE OR HAVE COORDINATED STANDARDS TO
( ˃ Д˂) YOU ARE USING AN AUSTRALIAN SERVER ON A SITE SERVED IN THE SHIFT_JIS CHARACTER ENCODING WHICH WHEN POSTING GRACEFULLY DEGRADES TO HTML ENTITIES FOR UNICODE CHARACTERS SUCH AS THE ANGLE BRACKETS FOUND ON THE HANDSOME GENT TO THE LEFT OF THIS STATEMENT HENCE ASCII RULES DO NOT APPLY IN ANY WAY THAT MAKES SENSE
( ˃ Д˂) GO CHECK THE RELEVANT JIS AND ISO DOCUMENTS AND YOU WILL SEE NO SUCH DEFINITION OF 0x60 AS A LEFT QUOTATION MARK
( ˃ Д˂) THIS IS BEFORE WE GET INTO HOW TWO SINGLE QUOTATIONS MARKS DO NOT A DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK MAKE IN THIS ENCODING SCHEME
( ˃ Д˂) I COULD GO ON FOR HOURS ABOUT HOW YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ENCODING STANDARDS BUT THE FACT IS THAT NONE OF IT MATTERS AS LONG AS THE FONTS WE ARE EXPECTED TO USE WITH THIS ENCODING AND SHIFT_JIS ART IDIOM SUCH AS MS PGOTHIC AND MONAFONT REQUIRE US TO SEE YOUR OBNOXIOUS SEPARATE GRAVE ACCENTS AS SUCH INSTEAD OF AS THE LEFT QUOTATION MARKS YOU SOLIPSISTICALLY CLAIM THEM TO BE THUS OFFENDING THE GREAT TRADITION OF ENGLISH TYPOGRAPHY AS IT HAS BEEN PRACTICED SINCE THE MID-EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
( ˃ Д˂) BY THE WAY YOU ARE NOT FIT TO LICK THE BUNGHOLES OF THE MEN YOU CITE